Search For
View CartCheck OutNews LetterNews Letter Sign-upWolfe Publishing Company
Wolfe Publishing Company
Handloader MagazineRifle MagazineSuccessful Hunter Magazine
Magazine Subscription Information
Wolfe Publishing Company
HomeShopping/Sporting GoodsBack IssuesLoaddataInternet AccessAdvertisingGun Links
Online Magazine Login:    User Name:    Password:       Subscribe to Online Magazine
Big Game Rifle
Rifle Magazine
June - July 2004
Volume 39, Number 3
ISSN: 0017-7393
Number 229
On the cover...
The Hornady Lock-N-Load AP five station press is shown with the CZ Model 85 Combat 9mm. Loading press photo by Stan Trzoniec. Pistol photo by Steve Gash.
Rifle Magazine
Rifle Magazine Wolfe Publishing Company
Rifle Magazine Featured Articles
Table of Contents
Columns
Features
Product Tests
What's New
space
Rifle Magazine
Product Tests

Lee
Lead Hardness Testing Kit

Shooters of cast lead bullets in rifles and handguns are often bedeviled by problems associated with fit and hardness: Fit as in the relationship between bullet diameter and barrel groove or chamber throat diameter; hardness as in the relationship between bullet hardness and the pressure developed by a given load. In addressing problems associated with fit, one usually needs a Cerrosafe cast or lead slug of chamber and barrel dimensions and a micrometer.

In dealing with hardness, empirical evidence will sometimes suffice, but it is usually better to identify actual bullet hardness and attempt to adjust pressure accordingly or, in some cases, to identify the pressure level and adjust the bullet hardness. This is so because, assuming proper fit to begin with, there is a quantifiable relationship between bullet hardness and the pressure at which the bullet will perform at its best.

To begin on this journey, we attempt to ascertain bullet hardness in terms of its Brinell hardness number (BHN). The technique was developed by Swedish metallurgist Johan Brinell and involves pushing a steel ball into the metal being tested and measuring the indentation. The load applied to the ball is divided by the surface area of the indentation to give the BHN. A tool to accomplish this has been recently introduced by Lee Precision of Hartford, Wisconsin, called the Lee Lead Hardness Testing Kit.

The Lee tool is not the first such to be made available to handloaders for measuring bullet hardness, joining, as it does, tools from Redding/SAECO and Lead Bullet Technology (LBT). The SAECO unit gives repeatable, comparative readings on a 1-to-10 scale but does not convert them to BHNs. The LBT tool does provide a direct BHN reading but had been off the market for some time. I’m told it is now available again. The Lee tool is available and, through the use of a chart, provides BHNs. It is rugged and, as befits the Lee Precision legacy, is inexpensively priced.

When I first became aware of the Lee tool, I jumped at the chance to test one, in part because I was interested and because I already had the LBT tool and wanted to see how closely the measurements from the two tools would coincide.

The Lee kit arrived in the company’s familiar red rectangular box. In it were a Calibrated Hardened Steel Ball Indenter, a V-Block Cradle, a 20-Power Optical Microscope and instructions. The indenter is shaped much like a reloading die, has 7/8x14 threads and screws into your reloading press. Inside is a spring-loaded plunger with a steel ball on the lower end. The upper end is a rod that will protrude through a hole in the top of the body when enough pressure is applied from below. The V-block cradle is much like a shellholder and fits into the press ram. A V slot is cut across the top of the cradle to hold the bullet to be measured.

In use, the indenter and V block are installed. The bullet to be tested is secured in a vise or held by pliers or something similar and a flat is filed on one side of the bullet. The bullet is placed in the V block, flat up. The press ram is raised until the indenter ball is resting against the bullet flat. The ram is then raised against the pressure of the spring until the rod appears even with the top of the tool body. Pressure is maintained for a minimum of 30 seconds and released. The bullet and V block are then removed, and the diameter of the impression in the bullet is measured using the micrometer.

The micrometer is an aluminum tube about 4 7/8 inches long and 7/16 inch in diameter. Inside is a four lens, 20x magnifier. On one surface are etched a series of 50 marks, or divisions, that run from .00 to .10, each division equaling .002 inch. By placing the microscope against the bullet and aligning the left or zero mark with the left edge of the impression, the diameter of the impression can be read on the right, in thousandths of an inch. From the chart included in the instructions, the BHN can be ascertained.

As I started to use the kit, I discovered there was a significant learning curve. I also experienced three difficulties that had to be overcome. Making the impression in the bullet and holding the pressure for the prescribed time was easy, although I had to rearrange some lighting in my loading room to ensure the ball was resting on the flat. I used a straight edge, or ruler, to ensure that as the press ram was raised, the rod did not protrude above the top of the indenter body.

There is a picture in the instructions that shows the bullet resting in the V block on a flat surface and the micrometer being held against it for reading. This didn’t work at all for me as there was too much movement. When I secured the V block in an adjustable wrench for added weight, the movement problem went away. I also experienced a problem with lighting. The incandescent lighting in my loading room was insufficient for careful reading of the diameter of the impression. By moving to the dining room with lots of natural light, that problem went away too. The third difficulty was with my eyesight. According to Lee, I should be    able to discern the impression edge between the etched divisions, thereby reading the diameter to the closest .001 inch. I couldn’t. Even after solving the other problems, I don’t believe I can see that well, although younger or sharper eyes may not have a problem at all. I am able to read to the closest division, i.e., to the nearest .002 inch, and that’s probably within 1/2 BHN or so and close enough for our purposes.

The learning curve came into play getting used to the kit and especially the fact that objects seen in the microscope are reversed and any movement must be in the opposite direction. Over time, I went from complete failure to a consistent misreading of the impression diameter to success.

My approach was to measure the hardness of a bullet on the LBT tester. I would then file a flat on the same bullet and repeat using the Lee tool. With the LBT tester I always took three readings and   averaged them. With the Lee, I took one or more and referred to the chart. During the misreading phase, I constantly got a higher reading using the Lee kit due to, I think, the lighting and eyesight problems. If the LBT reading gave me a BHN of, say, 14, as it did with several bullets, I consistently recorded 15.4 BHN with the Lee. Over time I was able to overcome the problems and the learning curve until a three impression average with the LBT tool gave me a BHN of 16.6 on a particular bullet. A careful testing with the Lee gave me a diameter of .056 inch. The chart equates that diameter to a BHN of 16.6! Keeping the caveats mentioned in mind, I’m satisfied the Lee Lead Hardness Testing Kit performs precisely as claimed and can be a useful addition to our handloading bag of tricks.

Knowing the BHN of a batch of bullets is, of course, useless unless you know how to relate it to performance. The secret is in knowing that the BHN times a constant – 1,422 – equals the pressure, in pounds per square inch, at which lead alloy bullets become malleable, that is, begin to obturate to fill the barrel or chamber throat. Many experimenters have found that applying sufficient pressure to cause slight obturation produced the best results (see Dave Scovill’s reports in Handloader Nos. 142 and 165). The Lee recommended approach is to keep pressure to about 90 percent of that at which obturation occurs. How and why is well documented in Chapter 10 of Richard Lee’s Modern Reloading, Second Edition. It is well worth reading.

A product test is not the place to debate the merits of differing approaches or to search for common ground. Still, cast bullet shooting is a fascinating field of study for the interested handloader. The new Lee Lead Hardness Testing Kit is a logical first step on that intriguing journey.

For more information, contact Lee Precision, 4275 Hwy U, Hartford WI 53027; or online at: www.leeprecision.com. – R.H. VanDenburg, Jr.

space
Awesome Art
Home  |  Magazine Subscription Information  |  Shopping / Sporting Goods  |  Back Issues  |  Loaddata  |  Internet Services  |  Advertising  |  Contact Us  |  Gun Links
Wolfe Publishing Company
Wolfe Publishing Company 2180 Gulfstream Suite A Prescott, Arizona 86301    Call Us Toll-Free 1.800.899.7810