|
 |
December - January 2004 Volume 39, Number
6 ISSN: 0017-7393 Number 232 |
|
|
On the
cover... The Stainless Ruger No 1 .204 Ruger is topped off with a Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10x variable scope. Rifle photo by Stan Trzoniec. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over the past couple of years, I have
received several questions and complaints regarding reliability issues with .357 Magnum
revolvers, due in part to guns and ammunition, so will share some of my experiences and
observations, as well as solutions to certain problems.
The .357 Magnum cartridge has been chambered
in a variety of guns, mostly of good quality, but there have been a few lemons, not worthy
of mention. For the purposes of this discussion, let’s focus on revolvers from Smith
& Wesson, Colt and Ruger, which represent the vast majority of guns in use.
The single most common reliability issue with
.357 Magnum revolvers is found in the primer and firing pin/recoil shield relationship.
Due to pressure, the primer flows one way or another into the firing pin hole upon firing.
This may only be slight, but it is enough that it can make cocking the revolver for the
next shot very difficult, since the deformed primer drags on the recoil shield, or in
extreme instances, the cylinder locks up firmly. We can only imagine the huge problem this
could pose for a gun used in a
defensive situation.
Until recently, Smith & Wesson Models 27,
28, 19, 66, 586 and 686 were equipped with hammer-mounted firing pins. Often when these
guns become “high mileage,” the recoil shield’s firing pin hole increases
in diameter and gives primers an opportunity to flow into small, unsupported areas around
the firing pin.
If a gun happens to have excess cylinder end
shake or headspace, the above problem is magnified. And if the gun has been fitted with a
reduced-power mainspring (or has had an action job wherein the hammer mainspring is
lightened), again primer flow into the firing pin hole is invited, and the primer can
actually push the firing pin and hammer back out the hole. The above problems have been
observed with new, unaltered, out-of-the-box revolvers so is not limited to worn or
high-mileage guns.
|
Firing pins that are frame mounted, such as
recently manufactured Smith & Wessons, Ruger single- and double-action revolvers and
most Colt double actions, generally have less primer flow issues, but they are not
entirely excused from problems. In these instances, the firing pin generally locks (or
binds) in its forward position and is held forward by the spent primer, again tying up the
gun. (Keep in mind that frame-mounted firing pins are spring loaded and should
automatically rebound when the hammer is cocked or rebounds.) This problem may be traced
to a firing pin of incorrect length, or incorrect headspace, but it is usually traced to
loads that are high pressure or a primer that flows excessively. In most instances, guns
suffering from the above issues will fire and function reliably using lower pressure .38
Special ammunition.
Solutions
Handguns that have worn firing pin holes,
incorrect headspace or firing pin length should obviously be corrected, but if
primer/firing pin problems still exist, it can usually be controlled through careful
selection of components and loads without sacrificing performance. In other words, some
shooters reduce loads or pressure to avoid these problems, but I prefer full-house loads
in .357 Magnum sixguns but also demand reliability. Before discussing specific solutions
that have worked in a variety of guns, it should be pointed out that current SAAMI average
working pressures for the .357 Magnum by ammunition companies are held to 35,000 psi
(which was previously 46,000 CUP) and is wise in my opinion. All loads discussed herein
are within that limit.
Generally speaking, Small Pistol Magnum
primers are designed to withstand greater pressures and will flatten and flow less than a
non-magnum version. The problem, however, is that some powders are designed to ignite with
a non-magnum primer and will develop excess pressures prematurely when used in conjunction
with a hot magnum primer. An example would include Alliant 2400. According to the Speer
Laboratory, 12.5 grains of 2400 behind a 158-grain JSP bullet and capped with a CCI 550
Small Pistol Magnum primer produced 1,089 fps and just under 35,000 psi from a Smith &
Wesson Model 19 with a 6-inch barrel. By switching to a 500 Small Pistol non-magnum primer
(and using the same bullet), the powder charge was increased to 14.8 grains for 1,265 fps
and produced the same chamber pressure. So, if we select a magnum primer with its harder
cup to prevent primer flow but use it with a powder designed for non-magnum priming, the
increase in chamber pressure will probably make the primer flow anyway, not to mention the
extra wear on the gun due to increased pressure. There are many other excellent powders
commonly used in the .357 Magnum that perform better when ignited with a non-magnum
primer.
On the other side of the coin, there are
certain powders that need a magnum primer to obtain reliable ignition and prevent erratic
ignition spikes or squib loads in cold weather. One example is Winchesters 296 Ball
powder, which has become popular among magnum revolver shooters, as it gives high
velocities while maintaining pressure levels that are within prescribed limits. It is
generally best to use the type of primer (magnum or non-magnum) the powder manufacturer
recommends, which will help prevent excess chamber pressures.
Most Small Pistol primers (both standard and
magnum) have a cup thickness of between .015 to .020 inch, but their thickness has little
to do with how easily they are ignited or how they flow around the firing pin, as each is
annealed and hardened to different specifications. Certain standard primers, such as the
Federal 100 and CCI 500, generally give good results with loads that generate up to 35,000
psi, and because of their great sensitivity, I prefer to use them when possible. (In this
way I can have a sixgun with a slicked-up action and lightened mainspring that still gives
reliable ignition.)
If a handgun is still showing firing
pin/recoil shield problems, it may be necessary to select a powder (such as Winchester
296, Hodgdon H-110 or LilGun) that is suitable to be used with a Small Pistol Magnum
primer. In these instances the Winchester Small Pistol Magnum, CCI 550 or Remington 5 1/2
will give good results and will generally cure most cylinder rotation issues.
|

In those unusual instances, when a revolver is
being particularly stubborn with cylinder freeze-up or dragging, even after trying the
above suggestions, we may have to select a Small Rifle primer to cure primer flow issues
such as Remington 6 1/2, Winchester Small Rifle and Federal 200. Before taking this step,
however, understand that most revolvers will require a full-power (or factory original)
mainspring to reliably ignite the tougher rifle cups (designed to withstand substantially
greater pressures without deforming). And be absolutely certain to select powders that
wont jump pressures substantially due to the faster ignition of the rifle primer.
Again, examples include Winchester 296, Hodgdon H-110 and LilGun, and it is strongly
suggested to not exceed recommended powder charges in spite of primers indicating that
pressures are low.
Regardless of the primer selected, it is
imperative to seat them .003 to .005 inch below flush. This assures that a
high primer wont drag on the recoil shield while the cylinder is
rotating and prevents the possibility of setting off primers of remaining cartridges
during recoil.
In the past few years, certain foreign cases
have been observed that had excessively large flash holes and allowed greater pressure to
the primer, causing deformation and considerable flowing. Select cases carefully and avoid
using mixed brass.
While the focus has been on priming, reducing
pressure will also reduce primer flow and flattening. While most commercial .357 jacketed
bullets have a single crimp groove, some cast bullets feature double crimp grooves,
allowing them to be seated farther out of the case, thus increasing overall cartridge
length. This increases powder capacity, while reducing chamber pressures, assuming we are
using the same powder charge.
I have an old (1955 vintage) Smith &
Wesson Combat Magnum (pre-Model 19) that gives sticky cylinder rotation when loaded with a
165-grain cast bullet (Lyman mould 358156) seated into its upper crimp groove behind
14.5 grains of Alliant 2400 and capped with a Federal 100 primer. By simply seating the
same bullet into its lower crimp groove and leaving the powder charge and priming the
same, pressures are reduced enough that no cylinder rotation problems have been detected.
With the above bullet seated deeply, with an overall cartridge length of 1.580 inches,
muzzle velocity runs 1,398 fps, whereas loads with the bullet seated out to an overall
length of 1.670 inches, velocity dropped slightly to 1,379 fps. Thats a slight
decrease in velocity but enough of a decrease in pressure to make the old Combat Magnum
work smoothly.
We live in a world of tremendous information,
but make certain that sources for handloading data are known (as there has been much
published data on the Internet from unknown sources that is dangerous). Stay within
recommended pressure limits of credible sources. The above tips for assembling reliable
.357 Magnum handloads may seem minor, but they have helped my sixguns tick as reliably as
Swiss watches.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|