feature By: Alan Garbers | July, 26

I have a problem. I suffer from FOMO. For those unfamiliar with modern acronyms, FOMO stands for “Fear of Missing Out.” While my Winchester Model 70 has filled the freezer again and again, the introduction of the Winchester 6.8 Western cartridge triggered a surge of anxiety. Was my faithful Winchester 270 obsolete? Would pronghorn and mule deer laugh off the smack of my handloads? It took months of rationalizing, but I finally came to terms with the idea that, while some modern cartridges outperform it, the Winchester 270 is still capable of delivering magnum-like performance. FOMO crisis averted!

After the excitement faded, I started researching just what I had won. The name Winchester evokes a proud heritage, and over the last 160 years, they have earned a reputation as the “Rifleman’s Rifle,” with the Model 70 being the pinnacle of quality.

In 2015, Winchester premiered their XPR rifle. Winchester engineers eliminated labor-intensive machining while designing components and coatings that combine into an accurate, easy-to-maintain hunting rifle. While I couldn’t find an exact definition for XPR, we can guess it stands for Xtreme Precision Rifle.
Since I am familiar with my Model 70, I was curious to see how the Winchester XRP differed. The deep blue luster of the receiver and barrel has been replaced with Winchester’s version of Cerakote. The rich warmth of walnut is now a weatherproof synthetic stock that is impervious to humidity changes. The original Model 70 had a machined flat-bottom receiver with an integral recoil lug. The XRP has a round receiver, which is easier and cheaper to machine and inherently concentric, which is known to improve accuracy. Some will argue that a flat-bottom receiver provides better accuracy. That would depend on many factors. I had an expensive rifle with a flat-bottom receiver, which easily was the most inaccurate rifle I have ever had the displeasure to own. On the other hand, many target rifle platforms use a round receiver. A Remington 700 that I owned (and should have kept) gave sub-MOA accuracy and was used by a friend to take a Boone & Crocket pronghorn buck in New Mexico.

The receiver’s profile and barrel nut harken back to that of older Savage rifles, which are known for their accuracy. The oversized bolt follows a trend I see across many manufacturers. The larger-diameter bolt is stronger and flexes less under the extreme bolt thrust of modern high-pressure cartridges. The 60-degree throw means faster bolt cycle times and more clearance for a wider range of scopes. Like higher-priced rifles, the XPR bolt-locking system uses three large lugs to spread the bolt thrust over a larger area. The XPR uses a push-feed system, common on most hunting rifles on the market. The exterior surface of the bolt is treated with a nickel-Teflon compound, making it corrosion-resistant and slick. The bolt can be field-stripped without special tools, which could save a hunt of a lifetime during freezing rain or wet snow.
As an added safety feature, a small red-dotted tab pops out from the rear of the bolt shroud to indicate the hammer is cocked.

The trigger of the original Model 70 was renowned for its simplicity and reliability. Admittedly, I assumed the trigger on the XPR would be a downgrade. I was wrong. On most firearms, I familiarize myself with the creep and travel as I load the trigger with finger pressure. The Winchester MOA trigger has no perceptible creep or travel. I press the trigger, and it breaks like glass. I have rifles costing three times what the XPR retails for, and the MOA trigger breaks more cleanly than they do. The trigger is adjustable by removing the action from the stock. The rifle came set to 3.5 pounds, but I wanted to go a little lighter. But, in doing so, the trigger became unstable and tripped with casual handling of the gun. I adjusted the screw back to the factory setting, and that’s where it will stay. Admittedly, now that I am used to the trigger, I wouldn’t want it any lighter. No aftermarket triggers are currently available. Contrary to what some claim, the Timney Winchester 70 MOA trigger will not work in the XPR series.


While most XPR rifles have a threaded muzzle for a brake or suppressor, my rifle didn’t. As soon as I received the gun, I brought it to my friendly gunsmith to have it rectified. The $100 cost was well worth it, as I hunt suppressed. I already have military service-induced tinnitus, and I need to protect the hearing that I have left.


The XPR comes in different configurations and action lengths. The basic models are predominantly seen


No provisions for open sights were included, and I would have removed them if they were, as I prefer a clean muzzle when weaving through the coat-snagging oak brush and cacti where I often hunt. The rifle came with a Vortex Crossfire II 3-9x40mm scope and Winchester two-piece scope mounts. Due to issues with my eyes, I need the scope farther back than most shooters prefer, and the original bases wouldn’t allow it. I have had good luck with EGW
Picatinny scope rails, and the extra length they provide for scope positioning. One thing I didn’t like was the Winchester scope rings. It doesn’t matter which screw is loosened; the scope is free to turn and slide, requiring the scope to be re-leveled after each change. I prefer scope rings that use a separate set of screws to clamp to the scope base and another set to clamp the scope tube. However, the gun was free, so I shouldn’t look a gift horse in the mouth.


At seven pounds, the XPR is comparable in weight to the Ruger American II, the Savage 110 Apex and its sister, the Model 70. Overall, I find the Winchester XPR a fitting checkmate to other competitive entry-level hunting rifles.
I found the accuracy acceptable for a hunting rifle. Considering the size of the kill zone of a deer, elk, or moose, the XPR would reliably make a killing shot out farther than most of us should be shooting. Practice and proper gun handling will always improve accuracy.
Shooting accuracy varied depending on bullet weight and type. All shooting was done from the shoulder, across a sandbag. A LabRadar LX was used to test all loads. Of the types I tried, the Winchester 170-grain Ballistic Silvertip gave the best results with five-shot groups running from 1.11 to 1.45 inches at 100 yards. Next was the Winchester Copper Impact 162-grain load, which ran 1.11 to 1.72 inches at 100 yards. The Winchester Expedition Big Game 165-grain load ran from 1.32 to 1.46” at 100 yards. I was amazed at the velocity. All loads tested were well over 2,900 fps, and the Ballistic Silvertip beat them all, averaging 3,004 fps.

